Dissipative soliton

Dissipative solitons (DSs) are stable solitary localized structures that arise in nonlinear spatially extended dissipative systems due to mechanisms of self-organization. They can be considered as an extension of the classical soliton concept in conservative systems. An alternative terminology includes autosolitons, spots and pulses.

Apart from aspects similar to the behavior of classical particles like the formation of bound states, DSs exhibit entirely nonclassical behavior – e.g. scattering, generation and annihilation – all without the constraints of energy or momentum conservation. The excitation of internal degrees of freedom may result in a dynamically stabilized intrinsic speed, or periodic oscillations of the shape.

Contents

Historical development

Origin of the soliton concept

DSs have been experimentally observed for a long time. Helmholtz[1] measured the propagation velocity of nerve pulses in 1850. In 1902, Lehmann[2] found the formation of localized anode spots in long gas-discharge tubes. Nevertheless, the term "soliton" was originally developed in a different context. The starting point was the experimental detection of "solitary water waves" by Russell in 1834.[3] These observations initiated the theoretical work of Rayleigh[4] and Boussinesq[5] around 1870, which finally led to the approximate description of such waves by Korteweg and de Vries in 1895; that description is known today as the (conservative) KdV equation.[6]

On this background the term "soliton" was coined by Zabusky and Kruskal[7] in 1965. These authors investigated certain well localised solitary solutions of the KdV equation and named these objects solitons. Among other things they demonstrated that in 1-dimensional space solitons exist, e.g. in the form of two unidirectionally propagating pulses with different size and speed and exhibiting the remarkable property that number, shape and size are the same before and after collision.

Gardner at al.[8] introduced the inverse scattering technique for solving the KdV equation and proved that this equation is completely integrable. In 1972 Zakharov and Shabat[9] found another integrable equation and finally it turned out that the inverse scattering technique can be applied successfully to a whole class of equations (e.g. the nonlinear Schrödinger and Sine-Gordon equations). From 1965 up to about 1975, a common agreement was reached: to reserve the term soliton to pulse-like solitary solutions of conservative nonlinear partial differential equations that can be solved by using the inverse scattering technique.

Weakly and strongly dissipative systems

With increasing knowledge of classical solitons, possible technical applicability came into perspective, with the most promising one at present being the transmission of optical solitons via glass fibers for the purpose of data transmission. In contrast to systems with purely classical behavior, solitons in fibers dissipate energy and this cannot be neglected on an intermediate and long time scale. Nevertheless the concept of a classical soliton can still be used in the sense that on a short time scale dissipation of energy can be neglected. On an intermediate time scale one has to take small energy losses into account as a perturbation, and on a long scale the amplitude of the soliton will decay and finally vanish.[10]

There are however various types of systems which are capable of producing solitary structures and in which dissipation plays an essential role for their formation and stabilization. Although research on certain types of these DSs has been carried out for a long time (for example, see the research on nerve pulses culminating in the work of Hodgkin and Huxley[11] in 1952), since 1990 the amount of research has significantly increased (see e.g. [12][13] [14]) Possible reasons are improved experimental devices and analytical techniques, as well as the availability of more powerful computers for numerical computations. Nowadays, it is common to use the term dissipative solitons for solitary structures in strongly dissipative systems.

Experimental observations of DSs

Today, DSs can be found in many different experimental set-ups. Examples include

Remarkably enough, phenomenologically the dynamics of the DSs in many of the above systems are similar in spite of the microscopic differences. Typical observations are (intrinsic) propagation, scattering, formation of bound states and clusters, drift in gradients, interpenetration, generation, and annihilation, as well as higher instabilities.

Theoretical description of DSs

Most systems showing DSs are described by nonlinear partial differential equations. Discrete difference equations and cellular automata are also used. Up to now, modeling from first principles followed by a quantitative comparison of experiment and theory has been performed only rarely and sometimes also poses severe problems because of large discrepancies between microscopic and macroscopic time and space scales. Often simplified prototype models are investigated which reflect the essential physical processes in a larger class of experimental systems. Among these are

\partial_t \boldsymbol{q} = \underline{\boldsymbol{D}} \Delta \boldsymbol{q} %2B \boldsymbol{R}(\boldsymbol{q}).
A frequently encountered example is the two-component Fitzhugh-Nagumo-type activator-inhibitor system
\left( \begin{array}{c} \tau_u \partial_t u\\\tau_v \partial_t v \end{array} \right) = \left(\begin{array}{cc} d_u^2 &0\\0&d_v^2 \end{array}\right) \left( \begin{array}{c} \Delta u\\ \Delta v \end{array} \right) %2B \left(\begin{array}{c} \lambda u -u^3 - \kappa_3 v %2B\kappa_1\\u-v \end{array}\right) .
Stationary DSs are generated by production of material in the center of the DSs, diffusive transport into the tails and depletion of material in the tails. A propagating pulse arises from production in the leading and depletion in the trailing end.[44] Among other effects, one finds periodic oscillations of DSs ("breathing"),[45][46] bound states,[47] and collisions, merging, generation and annihilation.[48]
\partial_t q = (d_r%2B i d_i) \Delta q %2B l_r q %2B (c_r %2B i c_i)|q|^2 q %2B (q_r %2B i q_i) |q|^4 q.
To understand the mechanisms leading to the formation of DSs, one may consider the energy ρ = |q|2 for which one may derive the continuity equation
\partial_t \rho %2B \nabla \cdot \boldsymbol{m} = S = d_r (q \Delta q^{\ast} %2B q^{\ast} \Delta q) %2B 2 l_r \rho %2B 2 c_r \rho^2 %2B 2 q_r \rho^3 \quad\text{with} \quad\boldsymbol{m} = 2 d_i \text{Im}(q^{\ast}\nabla q).
One can thereby show that energy is generally produced in the flanks of the DSs and transported to the center and potentially to the tails where it is depleted. Dynamical phenomena include propagating DSs in 1d,[50] propagating clusters in 2d,[51] bound states and vortex solitons,[52] as well as "exploding DSs".[53]
\partial_t q = (s_r%2B i s_i) \Delta^2 q %2B (d_r%2B i d_i) \Delta q %2B l_r q %2B (c_r %2B i c_i)|q|^2 q %2B (q_r %2B i q_i) |q|^4 q.
For dr > 0 one essentially has the same mechanisms as in the Ginzburg-Landau equation.[54] For dr < 0, in the real Swift-Hohenberg equation one finds bistability between homogeneous states and Turing patterns. DSs are stationary localized Turing domains on the homogeneous background.[55] This also holds for the complex Swift-Hohenberg equations; however, propagating DSs as well as interaction phenomena are also possible, and observations include merging and interpenetration.[56]

Particle properties and universality

DSs in many different systems show universal particle-like properties. To understand and describe the latter, one may try to derive "particle equations" for slowly varying order parameters like position, velocity or amplitude of the DSs by adiabatically eliminating all fast variables in the field description. This technique is known from linear systems, however mathematical problems arise from the nonlinear models due to a coupling of fast and slow modes.[57]

Similar to low-dimensional dynamic systems, for supercritical bifurcations of stationary DSs one finds characteristic normal forms essentially depending on the symmetries of the system. E.g., for a transition from a symmetric stationary to an intrinsically propagating DS one finds the Pitchfork normal form

\dot{\boldsymbol{v}} = (\sigma - \sigma_0) \boldsymbol{v} - |\boldsymbol{v}|^2 \boldsymbol{v}

for the velocity v of the DS,[58] here σ represents the bifurcation parameter and σ0 the bifurcation point. For a bifurcation to a "breathing" DS, one finds the Hopf normal form

\dot{A} = (\sigma - \sigma_0) A - |A|^2 A

for the amplitude A of the oscillation.[46] It is also possible to treat "weak interaction" as long as the overlap of the DSs is not too large.[59] In this way, a comparison between experiment and theory is facilitated.,[60] [61] Note that the above problems do not arise for classical solitons as inverse scattering theory yields complete analytical solutions.

See also

References

Inline

  1. ^ H. Helmholtz, Arch. Anat. Physiol. 57 (1850): 276
  2. ^ O. Lehmann, Ann. Phys. 4 (1902): 1
  3. ^ J. S. Russell, Report of the fourteenth meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (1845): 311
  4. ^ J. W. Rayleigh, Phil. Mag. 1 (1876): 257
  5. ^ J. Boussinesq, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sc. 72 (1871): 755
  6. ^ D. J. Korteweg and H. de Vries, Phil. Mag. 39 (1895): 422
  7. ^ N. J. Zabusky and M. D. Kruskal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15 (1965): 240
  8. ^ C. S. Gardner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967): 1095
  9. ^ V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Funct. Anal. Appl. 8 (1974): 226
  10. ^ Y. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons. From Fibers to Photonic Crystals, Academic press (2003)
  11. ^ A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, J. Physiol. 117 (1952): 500
  12. ^ B. S. Kerner and V. V. Osipov, Autosolitons. A New Approach to Problems of Self-Organization and Turbulence, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1995): 53
  13. ^ M. Bode and H.-G. Purwins, Physica D 86 (1995): 53
  14. ^ N. Akhmediev and A. Ankiewicz, Dissipative Solitons, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin (2005)
  15. ^ C. Radehaus et al., Phys. Lett. A 125 (1987): 92
  16. ^ I. Brauer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000): 4104
  17. ^ S. M. Rubens and J. E. Henderson, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940): 446
  18. ^ S. Nasuno, Chaos 13 (2003): 1010
  19. ^ D. Jäger et al., Phys. Lett. A 117 (1986): 141
  20. ^ K. M. Mayer et al., Z. Phys. B 71 (1988): 171
  21. ^ F.-J. Niedernostheide et al., Phys. stat. sol. (b) 172 (1992): 249
  22. ^ M. Beale, Phil. Mag. B 68 (1993): 573
  23. ^ V. B. Tarananko et al., Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997): 1582
  24. ^ V. B. Tarananko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998): 2236
  25. ^ A. Schreiber et al., Opt. Comm. 136 (1997): 415
  26. ^ B. Schäpers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000): 748
  27. ^ C. Denz et al., Transverse-Pattern Formation in Photorefractive Optics, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (2003): 188
  28. ^ S. Barland et al., Nature 419 (2002), 699
  29. ^ H.Zhang et al.,Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 455-460.
  30. ^ H. Zhang et al, “Multi-wavelength dissipative soliton operation of an erbium-doped fiber laser”, Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp.12692-12697
  31. ^ C. T. Hamik et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 105 (2001): 6144
  32. ^ S. L. Lane and D. Luss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993): 830
  33. ^ H. H. Rotermund et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991): 3083
  34. ^ R. Suzuki, Adv. Biophys. 9 (1976): 115
  35. ^ A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, J. Physiol. 117 (1952): 500
  36. ^ Dahlem MA, Hadjikhani N (2009) Migraine Aura: Retracting Particle-Like Waves in Weakly Susceptible Cortex. PLoS ONE 4(4): e5007
  37. ^ P. B. Umbanhowar et al., Nature 382 (1996): 793
  38. ^ O. Lioubashevski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999): 3190
  39. ^ O. Lioubashevski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996): 3959
  40. ^ G. Ahlers, Physica D 51 (1991): 421
  41. ^ F. Melo and S. Douady, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993): 3283
  42. ^ J. Nagumo et al., Proc. Inst. Radio Engin. Electr. 50 (1962): 2061
  43. ^ H.-G. Purwins et al., Dissipative Solitons in Reaction-Diffusion Systems, in Dissipative Solitons, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer (2005)
  44. ^ E. Meron, Phys. Rep. 218 (1992):1
  45. ^ F.-J. Niedernostheide et al. in Nonlinearity with Disorder, Springer Proc. Phys. 67 (1992): 282
  46. ^ a b S. V. Gurevich et al., Phys. Rev. E 74 (2006), 066201
  47. ^ M. Or-Guil et al., Physica D 135 (2000): 154
  48. ^ C. P. Schenk et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997): 3781
  49. ^ I. S. Aranson and L. Kramer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002): 99
  50. ^ V. V. Afanasjev et al., Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996): 1931
  51. ^ N. N. Rosanov et al., J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 102 (2006): 547
  52. ^ L.-C. Crasovan et al., Phys. Rev. E 63 (2000): 016605
  53. ^ J. M. Soto-Crespo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), 2937
  54. ^ J. M. Soto-Crespo and N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002): 066610
  55. ^ H. Sakaguchi and H. R. Brandt,Physica D 97 (1996): 274
  56. ^ H. Sakaguchi and H. R. Brandt, Physica D 117 (1998): 95
  57. ^ R. Friedrich, Group Theoretic Methods in the Theory of Pattern Formation, in Collective dynamics of nonlinear and disordered systems, Springer (2004)
  58. ^ M. Bode, Physica D 106 (1997): 270
  59. ^ M. Bode et al., Physica D 161 (2002): 45
  60. ^ H. U. Bödeker et al., Phys. Rev. E 67 (2003): 056220
  61. ^ H. U. Bödeker et al., New J. Phys. 6 (2004): 62

Books and overview articles